Navigating ESG Imperatives: The Role of Corporate Governance in Shaping Environmental and Social Outcomes in Emerging Markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59219/jheds.04.01.70Keywords:
ESG, Environmental Performance, Social Performance, Corporate Governance, China, PakistanAbstract
Corporate operational activities in the last two decades were significantly influenced by non-financial restraints, which have shaped their nature. Companies are increasingly being required to balance between financial performance and environmental and social responsibilities. There is a possibility that engaging in environmental and social initiatives may increase a company's reputation amongst stakeholders as well as curtail risks to shareholder welfare. The accountability of effective corporate governance and fostering sustainable practices is paramount for all companies. This study investigates the effect of corporate governance on the environmental and social performance of public companies in China and Pakistan. Using data from the Refinitiv Eikon database for 2010-2022, we found a significant positive correlation between corporate governance and environmental performance, showing that better-governed firms tend to have better environmental outcomes. However, there was no significant relationship between corporate governance on the one hand, implying difficulties in achieving balanced ESG outcomes on the other side. These findings highlight the need for focused policies to enhance social performance among emerging markets, which underscores the complexity of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
References
Ademi, B., & Klungseth, N. J. (2022). Does it pay to deliver superior ESG performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 companies. Journal of Global Responsibility, 13(4), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-01-2022-0006
Asgary, N., & Li, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Its economic impact and link to the bullwhip effect. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2492-1
Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies: Diversity of BoD and ESG: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007
Elshazli, R. M., Toraih, E. A., Elgaml, A., El-Mowafy, M., El-Mesery, M., Amin, M. N., Hussein, M. H., Killackey, M. T., Fawzy, M. S., & Kandil, E. (2020). Diagnostic and prognostic value of hematological and immunological markers in COVID-19 infection: A meta-analysis of 6320 patients. PloS One, 15(8), e0238160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238160
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66(101889), 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Goud, N. N. (2022). Corporate governance: Does it matter management of carbon emission performance? An empirical analyses of Indian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(134485), 134485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134485
He, F., Du, H., & Yu, B. (2022). Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82(102201), 102201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102201
Hegde, S. P., & Mishra, D. R. (2019). Married CEOs and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.003
Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility: Mapping the effect of CG on CSR. Corporate Governance An International Review, 24(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12154
Kim, E.-J., & Park, S. (2020). Transformational leadership, knowledge sharing, organizational climate and learning: an empirical study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-12-2018-0455
Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.196
Kumari, P. S. R., Makhija, H., Sharma, D., & Behl, A. (2022). Board characteristics and environmental disclosures: evidence from sensitive and non-sensitive industries of India. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 18(4), 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-10-2021-0547
Lagasio, V., & Cucari, N. (2019). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta‐analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1716
Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee, and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
Lopatta, K., Buchholz, F., & Kaspereit, T. (2016). Asymmetric information and corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 55(3), 458–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315575488
Lopatta, K., Jaeschke, R., & Chen, C. (2017). Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance: International evidence: Stakeholder engagement and (CSR) performance: International evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1398
Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate governance and carbon performance: role of carbon strategy and awareness of climate risk. Accounting and Finance, 61(2), 2891–2934. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12687
McCarthy, S., Oliver, B., & Song, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and CEO confidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, pp. 75, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.024
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, pp. 42, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001
Orij, R. P., Rehman, S., Khan, H., & Khan, F. (2021). Is CSR the new competitive environment for CEOs? The association between CEO turnover, corporate social responsibility, and board gender diversity: Asian evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2084
Petrovska, N. (2022). The Impact Of Social Media Marketing On Consumer Behavior. Macedonian International Journal of Marketing, 15, 61–69.
Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. (2015). The influence of family ownership on corporate social responsibility: An international analysis of publicly listed companies: Families and CSR. Corporate Governance An International Review, 23(3), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12086
Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9
Su, W., Peng, M. W., Tan, W., & Cheung, Y.-L. (2016). The signaling effect of corporate social responsibility in emerging economies. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2404-4
Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers’ environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68(101906), 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906
Tandelilin, E., & Usman, B. (2022). Toward a better understanding of social impact, CSR reporting and firm performance: a look at the ASEAN banking industry. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-04-2021-0167
Wong, P. T. (2022). Shifting the paradigm of positive psychology: Toward an existential positive psychology of wellbeing. Broadening the scope of wellbeing science: Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives on human flourishing and wellbeing. Springer.
Wood, G. (2017). The Norwegian government pension fund global and the implications of its activities for stakeholders. The Oxford Handbook of Sovereign Wealth Funds.
Yu, E. P.-Y., Van Luu, B., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social, and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52(101192), 101192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192
Zhang, J., Tan, X., Chen, W., Du, G., Fu, Q., Zhang, H., & Jiang, H. (2023). EFF_D_SVM: a robust multi-type brain tumor classification system. Frontiers in Neuroscience, p. 17, 1269100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1269100
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Higher Education and Development Studies (JHEDS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
