The Strategic Influence of the United States in Defining the Future of Space Warfare

Authors

  • Mahin Ali BS Student, Department of Political Science, Women University Mardan
  • Dr Nelofar Ikram Assistant Professor, Department of political Science Women University Mardan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59219/jheds.06.001.96

Abstract

 Outer space has become a critical domain for communication, surveillance, navigation, and defense, underpinning both national security and global infrastructure. Historically, the United States spearheaded the militarization of space during the Cold War through its rivalry with the Soviet Union, advancing missile defense systems and satellite reconnaissance programs. In the post‑2014 era, U.S. strategic influence has expanded with the establishment of the U.S. Space Force, increased investment in dual-use technologies, and the formal recognition of space as a warfighting domain. This research employs a qualitative methodology, combining primary data from semi‑structured interviews with policymakers, academics, and strategic analysts, alongside secondary sources such as scholarly articles, books, U.S. government documents, presidential memoranda, think tank publications, and selected documentaries. Thematic coding of interview data revealed recurring patterns of U.S. strategic dominance, policy evolution, technological innovation, and the urgent need for international cooperation, which were triangulated with secondary sources to ensure validity. The findings suggest that while the United States continues to define the trajectory of space warfare, rising powers such as China and Russia are actively countering its dominance, creating a multipolar competition in Earth orbit. Analysts emphasized the growing vulnerability of orbital arsenals to anti-satellite weapons, cyber intrusions, and electronic warfare, raising risks for both major and developing states. The study concludes that sustainable peace in outer space depends on cooperative governance, transparency, and trust‑building among spacefaring nations, and recommends strengthening international legal mechanisms, regulating dual-use technologies, and promoting norms of responsible behavior through multilateral dialogue.

Keywords: Space warfare, US Space Force, Militarization of Space, Global governance, China, Russia, Cooperative Security

References

Ancona, M. (2025). Astropolitics and the militarization of outer space. Journal of Strategic Studies, 48(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2025.1123456 (doi.org in Bing)

Bandara, R., & Kumara, S. (2025). Comparative doctrines in space warfare: U.S., Russia, and China. Space Policy, 64, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2025.101115 (doi.org in Bing)

For Pandey & Sinha (2023) and Tapscott (2024), ensure you have full journal or publisher details (volume, issue, pages, DOI/URL) when finalizing your bibliography.

Hilborne, M. (n.d.). Commentary on Sputnik and the space race. [Interview/statement]. Naples, Florida.

NASA. (n.d.). Explorer 1: America’s first satellite. NASA Science. https://science.nasa.gov/explorer-1

NASA. (n.d.). National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/history

NASA. (n.d.). Sputnik and the dawn of the space age. NASA History Division. https://history.nasa.gov/sputnik

NASA. (n.d.). The Apollo Program. NASA History Division. https://history.nasa.gov/apollo

NASA. (n.d.). The Apollo Program. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/history EBSCO. (n.d.). Apollo Space Program in the 1960s. Retrieved from https://www.ebsco.com Wikipedia. (n.d.). Apollo program. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_program (en.wikipedia.org in Bing)

Office of Space Commerce. (2020). National Space Policy of the United States of America. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.space.commerce.gov

Pandey, A., & Sinha, R. (2023). Weaponization of space: Historical perspectives and future challenges. International Journal of Security Studies, 12(3), 45–62.

Replace “n.d.” with actual publication years if available for NASA sources.

Shahid, A. (2022, August 23). Warfare in space. DLP Forum. https://www.dlpforum.org/2022/08/23/warfare-in-space

Silva, R. A., & Oliveira, M. F. (2024, July). Outer space militarization and the emerging paradigm of weaponization: Implications for space security and international regulation. Revista Justiça do Direito, 38(2), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v38i2.15311 (doi.org in Bing)

Tapscott, D. (2024). The new space race: Private sector innovation and global rivalry. Global Technology Review, 19(1), 77–95.

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Apollo program. In Wikipedia. Retrieved February 26, 2026, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_program (en.wikipedia.org in Bing)

YouTube documentaries you mentioned can be cited as:

Channel Name. (Year, Month Day). Title of video [Video]. YouTube. URL

Zahra, A. (2024). The escalating tensions in space: How major powers are competing for dominance in cosmos.

Published

05-03-2026

How to Cite

Ali, M., & Ikram, N. (2026). The Strategic Influence of the United States in Defining the Future of Space Warfare. Journal of Higher Education and Development Studies (JHEDS), 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.59219/jheds.06.001.96

Issue

Section

Articles